From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Quinones

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 17, 2018
157 A.D.3d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2017–02719

01-17-2018

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Eric QUINONES, appellant.

Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Kirk R. Brandt of counsel), for appellant. Timothy Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Croce of counsel), for respondent.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Kirk R. Brandt of counsel), for appellant.

Timothy Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Croce of counsel), for respondent.

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P., JEFFREY A. COHEN, BETSY BARROS, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDERAppeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Barbara Kahn, J.), dated February 7, 2017, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In this proceeding pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6–C), the defendant was designated a level three sex offender. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court properly assessed 15 points under risk factor 12 (acceptance of responsibility). The defendant's refusal to participate in a sex offender treatment program automatically demonstrates an unwillingness to accept responsibility for the crime (see People v. Grigg, 112 A.D.3d 802, 803, 977 N.Y.S.2d 84 ; People v. DeCastro, 101 A.D.3d 693, 693, 954 N.Y.S.2d 496 ). While the defendant contended that he refused to participate in treatment while incarcerated because he believed that he would be better served by attending a program when he was released, and that he planned to attend such a program, "[r]easons for not participating in sex offender treatment are only relevant in considering a request for a downward departure" ( People v. Grigg, 112 A.D.3d at 803, 977 N.Y.S.2d 84 ).

Further, the defendant's contention that he is entitled to a downward departure, which is made for the first time before this Court, is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit (see People v. Sweat, 147 A.D.3d 802, 802, 45 N.Y.S.3d 800 ).

CHAMBERS, J.P., COHEN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Quinones

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 17, 2018
157 A.D.3d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Quinones

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Eric QUINONES, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 17, 2018

Citations

157 A.D.3d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
157 A.D.3d 834
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 322

Citing Cases

People v. Rosario

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the People established, by clear and convincing evidence, that the…

People v. Braxton

Instead, he offered explanations for his refusal to participate in the program. A refusal to participate in a…