From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pullano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 14, 1992
185 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

July 14, 1992

Appeal from the Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his claim that the Grand Jury proceedings were defective because evidence obtained pursuant to an unlawful wiretap (see, People v. Chiarenza, 185 A.D.2d 679 [decided herewith]; People v Candella, 171 A.D.2d 329) was presented to the Grand Jury (see, People v. Kazmarick, 52 N.Y.2d 322, 326).

We decline defendant's request that we modify, in the interest of justice, the one-year imprisonment term imposed by the sentencing court.


Summaries of

People v. Pullano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 14, 1992
185 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Pullano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DOMINIC PULLANO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 14, 1992

Citations

185 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Chiarenza

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant, by entering an Alford plea to a reduced charge,…