From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Prude

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2009
62 A.D.3d 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2006-11744.

May 19, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), rendered October 3, 2006, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel; Katherine M. Rudish on the brief), for respondent.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant pleaded guilty with the full understanding that he would receive the sentence actually imposed and, therefore, he has "no basis now to complain that his sentence was excessive" ( People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817; see People v Ubiles, 59 AD3d 572; People v Grigg, 53 AD3d 629, 630). In any event, under the circumstances, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).


Summaries of

People v. Prude

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2009
62 A.D.3d 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Prude

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SEQUAN PRUDE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 19, 2009

Citations

62 A.D.3d 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 4089
878 N.Y.S.2d 628

Citing Cases

People v. Ramos

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant pleaded guilty with the full understanding that the…

People v. Caguana

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. "[S]ince the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he…