From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Praete

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Feb 14, 1991
150 Misc. 2d 389 (N.Y. App. Term 1991)

Opinion

February 14, 1991

Appeal from the Justice Court of the Village of Bronxville, Westchester County, Alan R. Wentzel, J.


MEMORANDUM.

Judgment of conviction affirmed.

Since the defendant actually passed a speed limit sign, it was unnecessary for the People to establish that area speed limit signs were posted at the entrances to the village (see, People v Lord, 29 Misc.2d 685). We also note our agreement with the conclusion of the court below that the testimony of the officer as to the size of the sign sufficiently established its conformity to legal requirements, even assuming that the highway on which defendant was traveling was a "Four lane conventional highway" (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1110 [d]; 17 NYCRR 200.5, 201.2 [h] [3] [iii]).

STARK, J.P., COLLINS and INGRASSIA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Praete

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Feb 14, 1991
150 Misc. 2d 389 (N.Y. App. Term 1991)
Case details for

People v. Praete

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANK C. PRAETE, JR.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1991

Citations

150 Misc. 2d 389 (N.Y. App. Term 1991)
575 N.Y.S.2d 623

Citing Cases

People v. Kennedy

o modify a sentence” (People v. Delgado, 80 N.Y.2d 780, 783 1992 ) “even where a trial court has not abused…

Pernick v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed, on the merits, with costs. The…