From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Powers

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Oct 12, 2018
61 Misc. 3d 131 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)

Opinion

570268/14

10-12-2018

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, v. Steven POWERS, Defendant-Appellant.


Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Richard M. Weinberg, J.), rendered January 6, 2014, affirmed.

The accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective. It charged all the elements of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (see Penal Law § 220.03 ), and set forth sufficient factual allegations to show the basis for the arresting officer's conclusion that the substance at issue was a controlled substance. The instrument recited that police "recovered a controlled substance to wit pills of Ketamine from defendant's right hand" and that the officer knew the pills were Ketamine "based upon his professional training as a police officer in the identification of drugs, his prior experience as a police officer in drug arrests, and observation of the packaging, which is characteristic of this type of drug" (see People v. Smalls , 26 NY3d 1064 [2015] ; People v. Kalin , 12 NY3d 225, 231-232 [2009] ; People v. Pearson , 78 AD3d 445 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 799 [2011] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

People v. Powers

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Oct 12, 2018
61 Misc. 3d 131 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
Case details for

People v. Powers

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, v. Steven Powers, Defendant-Appellant.

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Oct 12, 2018

Citations

61 Misc. 3d 131 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 51432
111 N.Y.S.3d 161

Citing Cases

People v. Parsons

In all three instances, the accusatory instrument was a complaint (seePeople v. Battle , 62 Misc. 3d 151[A],…