From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McMahon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 16, 2017
153 A.D.3d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

08-16-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Richard McMAHON, appellant.

Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Lauren Tan of counsel), for respondent.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Lauren Tan of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cohen, J.), rendered May 12, 2016, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Ambro, J.), upon a finding that he violated conditions thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted burglary in the second degree.

ORDERED that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal, the validity of which he does not challenge on appeal, precludes appellate review of his contention that the County Court erred in denying his pre-plea recusal motion (see People v. Weston, 145 A.D.3d 746, 747, 43 N.Y.S.3d 413 ; People v. Smith, 138 A.D.3d 1415, 1416, 29 N.Y.S.3d 726 ; People v. Mahipat, 49 A.D.3d 1243, 1244, 852 N.Y.S.2d 872 ; People v. Anderson, 304 A.D.2d 975, 976, 756 N.Y.S.2d 916 ).

CHAMBERS, J.P., MILLER, HINDS–RADIX and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McMahon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 16, 2017
153 A.D.3d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. McMahon

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Richard McMAHON, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 16, 2017

Citations

153 A.D.3d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
57 N.Y.S.3d 897

Citing Cases

People v. Taylor

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's contention that the County Court improvidently…

People v. Hobbs

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his…