From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Porter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1994
201 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 4, 1994

Appeal from the Erie County Court, Drury, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion, made at the time of trial, for an adjournment for 30 days to retain new counsel (see, People v. Arroyave, 49 N.Y.2d 264, 271). Defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently relinquished his right to be present at trial (see, People v. Epps, 37 N.Y.2d 343, 349-351, cert denied 423 U.S. 999). We reject the argument of defendant that his waiver was not voluntary because the court denied his motion for an adjournment. Defendant's remedy to correct any perceived erroneous ruling is by appealing and not by "withdrawing" from the trial.

We have reviewed the issues raised by defendant in his pro se supplemental brief and we find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Porter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1994
201 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Porter

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS PORTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 4, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
607 N.Y.S.2d 796

Citing Cases

People v. Segatol-Islami

While we agree with defendant that County Court erred in concluding that she could not waive her presence…