From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Porchea

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 22, 2022
204 A.D.3d 1444 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

351 KA 18-00715

04-22-2022

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Everson I. PORCHEA, Defendant-Appellant.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (WILLIAM CLAUSS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (WILLIAM CLAUSS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of robbery in the first degree ( Penal Law § 160.15 [4] ). Preliminarily, as defendant contends and the People correctly concede, the record does not establish that defendant validly waived his right to appeal. County Court's "oral waiver colloquy and the written waiver signed by defendant together ‘mischaracterized the nature of the right that defendant was being asked to cede, portraying the waiver as an absolute bar to defendant taking an appeal and the attendant rights to counsel and poor person relief, as well as a bar to all postconviction relief, and there is no clarifying language in either the oral or written waiver indicating that appellate review remained available for certain issues’ " ( People v. Johnson , 192 A.D.3d 1494, 1495, 140 N.Y.S.3d 833 [4th Dept. 2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 965, 148 N.Y.S.3d 770, 171 N.E.3d 246 [2021] ; see People v. Shanks , 37 N.Y.3d 244, 253 and n., 154 N.Y.S.3d 646, 176 N.E.3d 682 [2021] ; People v. Thomas , 34 N.Y.3d 545, 564-566, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 [2019], cert denied ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 2634, 206 L.Ed.2d 512 [2020] ). Although we are thus not precluded from reviewing defendant's challenge to the severity of his sentence, we nevertheless conclude that the negotiated sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.


Summaries of

People v. Porchea

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 22, 2022
204 A.D.3d 1444 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

People v. Porchea

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Everson I. PORCHEA…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 22, 2022

Citations

204 A.D.3d 1444 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
204 A.D.3d 1444

Citing Cases

People v. Hubbert

Preliminarily, as defendant contends and the People correctly concede, the record does not establish that…

People v. Hubbert

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual abuse in the…