From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Poppel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 1988
143 A.D.2d 854 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

October 17, 1988

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Braatz, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in a light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the conviction. The evidence established that the defendant, as the driver of the getaway car, aided her companion in the burglary of a residence and shared his culpable intent (see, People v Keitt, 42 N.Y.2d 926; People v Mercado, 114 A.D.2d 377; Penal Law § 20.00). Moreover upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15). Mangano, J.P., Weinstein, Kooper and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Poppel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 1988
143 A.D.2d 854 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Poppel

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SARAJANE POPPEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 17, 1988

Citations

143 A.D.2d 854 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Grimes

rther contention that the evidence is not legally sufficient to establish his liability as an accomplice…

People v. Delvillartron

05[2]; People v. Hawkins, 11 N.Y.3d 484, 492, 872 N.Y.S.2d 395, 900 N.E.2d 946; People v. Pitre, 108 A.D.3d…