From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pittman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 19, 1993
197 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

October 19, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Covington, J.).


Overwhelming evidence at trial was that defendant unlawfully entered the building in question and intentionally attempted to gain entry into an apartment therein by kicking in an interior wall. Thus, the trial court properly denied defendant's request for a jury charge on trespass as a lesser included offense of the burglary charge, as there was no reasonable view of the evidence that defendant had committed the lesser but not the greater offense (People v. Glover, 57 N.Y.2d 61, 63).

As defendant's direct testimony specifically brought into issue the credibility of the building superintendent, the prosecutor properly cross-examined defendant regarding that issue (People v Rivera, 159 A.D.2d 229, 230-231, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 969). Additionally, there is no support in the record for defendant's claim that the prosecutor improperly waved defendant's criminal record sheet in front of the jury or somehow suggested that defendant had prior convictions other than those allowed by the trial court's Sandoval ruling (see, People v. Jimenez, 144 A.D.2d 697, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 978).

We have considered defendant's additional arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Ross and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Pittman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 19, 1993
197 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Pittman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KECIA PITTMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 19, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 834

Citing Cases

People v. Haywood

Defendant's contention that the prosecutor improperly compelled defendant to testify on cross-examination…