From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pinkard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1994
209 A.D.2d 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 16, 1994

Appeal from the Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was sentenced to a definite term of one year in the Ontario County Jail on each conviction for petit larceny and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree and to an unconditional discharge on the conviction for harassment. There is no merit to defendant's contention that County Court erred in imposing consecutive definite sentences, the aggregate of which exceeds one year (see, Penal Law § 70.25). The petit larceny of the television set and the unauthorized use of the motor vehicle were committed during separate and distinct incidents or transactions (see, People v. Booth, 119 A.D.2d 758, 759). Thus, in the circumstances of this case, the court legally imposed consecutive definite sentences, the aggregate of which exceeds one year.


Summaries of

People v. Pinkard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1994
209 A.D.2d 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Pinkard

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KASTRADELL PINKARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 1008

Citing Cases

People v. Mainella

Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court violated Penal Law § 70.25 (2) and (3) by imposing…

People v. Curione

We reject that contention. The incidents giving rise to the conviction involved different victims and…