From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Phillips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 14, 1997
237 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 14, 1997.

Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Callahan, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


During the suppression hearing, defendant twice requested that County Court conduct a Barden inquiry because the arresting officers had no information establishing probable cause other than that provided by an informer ( see, People v Darden, 34 NY2d 177, rearg denied 34 NY2d 995). Because there is "insufficient evidence to establish probable cause apart from the testimony of the arresting officer as to communications received from [the] informer" ( People v Darden, supra, at 181), the court erred in denying defendant's request for a Darden hearing ( see, People v Adrion, 82 NY2d 628, 633-634). Thus, we hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to Onondaga County Court to conduct a Darden hearing. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.)


Summaries of

People v. Phillips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 14, 1997
237 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CLIFTON A. PHILLIPS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 739

Citing Cases

People v. Phillips

        MEMORANDUM:         Following remittal by this Court for a Darden hearing (People v. Phillips,…

People v. Phillips

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Callahan, Boehm and Fallon, JJ. (Filed Sept. 5, 1997.) Following remittal by…