From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Phillips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2000
269 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued January 20, 2000

February 28, 2000

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leach, J.), rendered July 13, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Nicoletta J. Caferri, David L. Bendik, and Matthew Schechter of counsel), for respondent.

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed

The defendant correctly asserts that the undercover police officer's expert opinion as to how the defendant rid himself of the buy money was improper, as it was not based on either evidence in the record or his personal knowledge (see, Cassano v. Hagstrom, 5 N.Y.2d 643 ). However, in light of the fact that the evidence against the defendant was otherwise overwhelming, and there is no significant probablility that the defendant would have been acquitted if not for the error in permitting the testimony, the error was harmless (see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230 ).


Summaries of

People v. Phillips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2000
269 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. TYRONE PHILLIPS, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 28, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 922

Citing Cases

People v. Park

Insofar as defense counsel objected to the challenged hypothetical questions, they were improper as they…