From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Petersen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 25, 1958
152 N.E.2d 532 (N.Y. 1958)

Opinion

Argued April 29, 1958

Decided June 25, 1958

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, SHELDON F. WICKES, Acting J.

Joseph P. Fallon for appellant.

Frank A. Gulotta, District Attorney ( Henry P. De Vine of counsel), for respondent.


Prejudicial error was committed by the trial court in allowing the prosecution to exploit the fact that defendant had not told the police, the Judge, the District Attorney and the Grand Jury that he was not driving his car at the time he was so charged, but that it had been driven by someone else. Defendant was under no duty to speak when in the custody of the authorities, and his failure to do so cannot be the basis of an inference of guilt on his part ( People v. Rutigliano, 261 N.Y. 103, 106-107; People v. Dolce, 261 N.Y. 108; People v. Travato, 309 N.Y. 382, 386; People v. Namer, 309 N.Y. 458, 464; People v. Hyman, 308 N.Y. 794; People v. Allen, 300 N.Y. 222, 225; People v. Abel, 298 N.Y. 333; People v. Mleczko, 298 N.Y. 153: People v. Pignataro, 263 N.Y. 229).

The further references to this subject in the prosecutor's summation aggravated the error, which error was not cured by the instruction of the trial court properly stating the applicable law.

Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE concur.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered.


Summaries of

People v. Petersen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 25, 1958
152 N.E.2d 532 (N.Y. 1958)
Case details for

People v. Petersen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GEORGE JOHN PETERSEN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 25, 1958

Citations

152 N.E.2d 532 (N.Y. 1958)
152 N.E.2d 532
177 N.Y.S.2d 510

Citing Cases

United States ex Rel. Parker v. McMann

It is well settled in New York that "a person in custody accused of a crime is under no duty to speak and…

People v. Conyers

In the second, fall People v Arce ( 42 N.Y.2d 179, 187) and People v Thomas ( 46 N.Y.2d 100, 109, supra). Of…