From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Peskin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 22, 1965
208 N.E.2d 180 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Argued March 18, 1965

Decided April 22, 1965

Appeal from the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, WILLIAM E. RINGEL, P.J., JOHN J. MANGAN and VINCENT R. IMPELLITTERI, JJ., NICHOLAS F. DELAGI, P.J., BERNARD J. O'CONNELL and EDWARD D. CAIAZZO, JJ.

Stanley Hendricks for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Raymond S. Hack and H. Richard Uviller of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed. The evidence was seized as an incident to a lawful arrest not dependent on the validity of the search warrant. (See People v. Matherson, 16 N.Y.2d 509, decided herewith.) No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

People v. Peskin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 22, 1965
208 N.E.2d 180 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

People v. Peskin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SIDNEY PESKIN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 22, 1965

Citations

208 N.E.2d 180 (N.Y. 1965)
208 N.E.2d 180
260 N.Y.S.2d 449

Citing Cases

People v. Peskin

Decided May 27, 1965 Appeal from ( 16 N.Y.2d 511) MOTIONS TO AMEND…

People v. Kokich

In Matherson the court there allowed evidence that was seized, saying the seizure was valid as incidental to…