From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 1979
73 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

December 13, 1979


Application by assigned counsel for "permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant," based upon the conclusory statement in his perfunctory brief, that he "found no non-frivolous issues to be raised on appeal," granted only to the extent of assigning alternate counsel to prosecute expeditiously the appeal by whatever means deemed appropriate. Present counsel has totally failed to comply with or even attempt to follow the "guidelines" provided in People v. Saunders ( 52 A.D.2d 833) (People v Carroll, 72 A.D.2d 710). By so doing, he has rendered himself ineligible for compensation for such efforts.

Concur — Fein, J.P., Sullivan, Markewich, Silverman and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Perry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 1979
73 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

People v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM PERRY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1979

Citations

73 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

People v. Frazier

Counsel in his present brief has alluded to at least one legal point arguable on the merits. This failure to…

People v. Bryant

The pro se motion papers submitted by defendant allude to nonfrivolous appellate issues. This, together with…