From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perrin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1990
163 A.D.2d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

July 13, 1990

Appeal from the Chautauqua County Court, Adams, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Since destruction of the dispatch tape by the police was inadvertent, the sanction of dismissal was not necessary to rectify whatever harm defendant may have suffered by the loss of this evidence (see, People v Rice, 75 N.Y.2d 929, 932; People v. Martinez, 71 N.Y.2d 937, 940; People v. Kelly, 62 N.Y.2d 516, 520-521; People v. Beam, 161 A.D.2d 1153). The court did not abuse its discretion in imposing an adverse inference charge as a lesser sanction for the failure to preserve the tape. The court properly refused to charge unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree as a lesser included offense because there was no reasonable view of the evidence to support it (see, People v. Green, 56 N.Y.2d 427). Defendant's contentions regarding the court's charge and evidentiary rulings do not require reversal. On this record defendant's sentence is not excessive.


Summaries of

People v. Perrin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1990
163 A.D.2d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Perrin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEFFREY S. PERRIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 13, 1990

Citations

163 A.D.2d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
559 N.Y.S.2d 157

Citing Cases

People v. Passariella

In addition, the court's instruction to the jury that the People's pretrial destruction of cocaine could be…

People v. Marr

County Court properly exercised its discretion in fashioning an appropriate sanction. Although an adverse…