From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 1994
208 A.D.2d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 31, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Orgera, J.).


Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.

A review of the record indicates that the defendant entered her pleas knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily (see, People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 17).

Inasmuch as the defendant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are premised on facts dehors the record, they are beyond review on direct appeal (see, People v. Dyson, 200 A.D.2d 756). Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 1994
208 A.D.2d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARMEN PEREZ, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 579

Citing Cases

People v. Ortiz

Further, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by denying, without a hearing, the…