From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pepe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1999
262 A.D.2d 7 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 1, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Silverman, J.).


The court properly exercised its discretion in precluding defendant from commenting on the People's failure to call a witness and in instructing the jury not to speculate as to what testimony the witness might have given, since defendant did not establish any foundation for such a summation comment ( see, People v. Tankleff, 84 N.Y.2d 992, 995).

The record establishes a valid waiver of defendant's right to attend bench conferences during voir dire.

Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Pepe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1999
262 A.D.2d 7 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Pepe

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES PEPE, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 7 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
690 N.Y.S.2d 566

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

"A defendant not necessarily entitled to a missing witness charge may nonetheless try to persuade the jury to…

People v. Nails

To the extent the defendant is raising a constitutional claim, his contention is unpreserved for appellate…