From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Peele

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 23, 1963
188 N.E.2d 265 (N.Y. 1963)

Summary

In People v Peele (12 N.Y.2d 890, 891), we held that the trial court did not commit reversible error when it permitted the prosecutor to question the defendant concerning a Virginia juvenile delinquency adjudication, "since the prosecutor in good faith believed that there had been a criminal conviction."

Summary of this case from People v. Gray

Opinion

Argued January 15, 1963

Decided January 23, 1963

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, JOSEPH A. SARAFITE, J.

Nanette Dembitz and Anthony F. Marra for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Joseph A. Phillips and H. Richard Uviller of counsel), for respondent.


Since juvenile delinquency adjudications are not convictions of crime either in New York or Virginia (see former N.Y. City Dom. Rel. Ct. Act, § 84 and former Children's Ct. Act, § 45, subd. 4; Family Ct. Act, § 781; Code of Virginia, § 16.1-179), it was erroneous and improper at this trial to use such an adjudication, made in Virginia, as a "criminal conviction" to impeach the testimony of defendant. The error in this case was, however, not reversible since the prosecutor in good faith believed that there had been a criminal conviction, and the references thereto at the trial could not on this record have prejudiced defendant's substantial rights.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed pursuant to section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI concur.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Peele

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 23, 1963
188 N.E.2d 265 (N.Y. 1963)

In People v Peele (12 N.Y.2d 890, 891), we held that the trial court did not commit reversible error when it permitted the prosecutor to question the defendant concerning a Virginia juvenile delinquency adjudication, "since the prosecutor in good faith believed that there had been a criminal conviction."

Summary of this case from People v. Gray
Case details for

People v. Peele

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALPHONSO PEELE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 23, 1963

Citations

188 N.E.2d 265 (N.Y. 1963)
188 N.E.2d 265
237 N.Y.S.2d 999

Citing Cases

People v. Gray

Indeed, in People v Mackey ( 49 N.Y.2d 274, 281), we declined to hold that the trial court abused its…

In Interest of I.S.H

Applying the clear terms of identical or equivalent statutes, the courts have consistently held that a…