Opinion
June 7, 1991
Appeal from the Oneida County Court, Parker, J.
Present — Doerr, J.P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant's contention that the court erred in failing to submit counts charging intentional and reckless conduct in the alternative is unpreserved and we decline to reach the issue in the interest of justice (see, People v Carey, 151 A.D.2d 989, lv denied 74 N.Y.2d 806; People v Dukett, 147 A.D.2d 938, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 976). Defendant raised that issue in a posttrial motion but failed to object before the jury was discharged, when any defect could have been remedied by resubmission to the jury (see, People v Satloff, 56 N.Y.2d 745).
We have examined defendant's remaining arguments on appeal and find none that requires reversal.