From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Parker

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Jun 16, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 5019 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

882 KA 15-01765

06-16-2017

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. DURVAL W. PARKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (HANNAH STITH LONG OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


PRESENT:

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (HANNAH STITH LONG OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boller, A.J.), rendered April 21, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [12]). Defendant's sole contention is that, under CPL 20.40 and the New York Constitution, the Erie County grand jury lacked authority and jurisdiction to indict him for the crime committed in Niagara County to which he pleaded guilty. We conclude that defendant's contention is foreclosed by his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see generally People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570, 573-574). Although defendant contends that the waiver does not encompass his challenge to the geographic jurisdiction of the grand jury inasmuch as that issue was not specifically mentioned during the waiver colloquy, the court "need not expressly delineate for a defendant those appellate issues that are foreclosed by a waiver of the right to appeal, and those that survive, in order for the court to obtain a valid appeal waiver" (People v Nickell, 49 AD3d 1024, 1025). We note, in any event, that defendant's challenge to geographical jurisdiction in Erie County is foreclosed by his guilty plea (see People v Hand, 140 AD3d 636, 637, lv denied 28 NY3d 971).

Entered: June 16, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

People v. Parker

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Jun 16, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 5019 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. DURVAL W. PARKER…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 5019 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)