From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Park

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 30, 1995
211 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

January 30, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Appelman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment rendered January 9, 1991, and the order dated May 17, 1993, are affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to hear and report on the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction on the ground that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel, and the appeal from the order dated December 19, 1991, is held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court, Queens County, is to file its report with all convenient speed.

Under the particular circumstances of this case, we find that it was error to summarily deny the defendant's motion to vacate the judgment of conviction (see, CPL 440.10) on the ground that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. The defendant's motion was supported by affidavits which tended to show the availability of witnesses who could have testified in support of an alibi defense, and who could have testified that the defendant's physical condition was such as to render it less likely that he was one of the perpetrators. Such evidence might well have been decisive of the trial's outcome. There should have been a hearing in order to determine the extent of the trial counsel's awareness of these potential witnesses, in order to determine whether the trial counsel, if aware of these witnesses, had a valid tactical reason for not presenting them at trial, and in order to determine all the other issues which properly bear on the defendant's claim that he was deprived of his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel (see generally, People v. Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705; People v. Satterfield, 66 N.Y.2d 796; People v. Montana, 149 A.D.2d 738).

We have examined those issues reviewable on the defendant's direct appeal from the judgment, and those reviewable on his appeal, by permission, from the order dated May 17, 1993, and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Park

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 30, 1995
211 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Park

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS PARK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 30, 1995

Citations

211 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
621 N.Y.S.2d 379

Citing Cases

People v. Radcliffe

The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, recognized as much in a case similar to the instant case where the…

People v. Coleman

Although counsel may have proceeded appropriately based upon the information made known to him, or,…