From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Palumbo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 22, 1980
406 N.E.2d 437 (N.Y. 1980)

Summary

In People v. Palumbo (49 N.Y.2d 928, supra, rev 65 A.D.2d 443, on remand 79 A.D.2d 518) the accused director of leasing for the New York City Department of Real Estate, was stopped on his way to work in the morning, and was requested to accompany two detectives.

Summary of this case from People v. Austin

Opinion

Argued March 19, 1980

Decided April 22, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MORRIS GOLDMAN, J.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Norman Barclay and Robert M. Pitler of counsel), for appellant.

Allen Green for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and the case remitted to that court for determination of the facts with respect to the suppression of defendant's statements.

The Appellate Division held that the interview of defendant conducted in the offices of the Department of Investigation on June 3, 1976 was a custodial interrogation as a matter of law. In consequence, the preinterrogation constitutional warnings not having been given, defendant was entitled to suppression of the statements that he had then made. We cannot agree that this interrogation was custodial as a matter of law, i.e., that under no view of the evidence in the record could it be found to be noncustodial. Accordingly, we hold that the determination of the Appellate Division in this regard was error. The case must, therefore, be remitted to the Appellate Division for determination of the facts under CPL 470.40 (subd 2, par [b]).

The other error on which the Appellate Division would have reversed (and granted a new trial) — namely, misuse of the taped conversations of defendant — was not preserved for appellate review, no timely protest on this theory having been registered. Accordingly, that issue is beyond the scope of our review (People v Johnson, 47 N.Y.2d 124).

We have examined defendant's other contentions and conclude that the errors asserted either were not preserved for our review or are without merit.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.


Summaries of

People v. Palumbo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 22, 1980
406 N.E.2d 437 (N.Y. 1980)

In People v. Palumbo (49 N.Y.2d 928, supra, rev 65 A.D.2d 443, on remand 79 A.D.2d 518) the accused director of leasing for the New York City Department of Real Estate, was stopped on his way to work in the morning, and was requested to accompany two detectives.

Summary of this case from People v. Austin
Case details for

People v. Palumbo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. MICHAEL R. PALUMBO…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 22, 1980

Citations

406 N.E.2d 437 (N.Y. 1980)
406 N.E.2d 437
428 N.Y.S.2d 620

Citing Cases

People v. Palumbo

Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals, judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered July 6, 1977,…

People v. Austin

A conclusion as to whether the accused was in custody or not, may not, at least in the unexceptional case, be…