From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Palmer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 23, 2022
203 A.D.3d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

2019–12906 Ind. No. 8215/18

03-23-2022

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Brian PALMER, appellant.

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Ava C. Page of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Anthea H. Bruffee, and Daniel Berman of counsel), for respondent.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Ava C. Page of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Anthea H. Bruffee, and Daniel Berman of counsel), for respondent.

ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barry E. Warhit, J.), rendered October 16, 2019, convicting him of persistent sexual abuse, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review a final order of protection issued at the time of sentencing.

ORDERED that upon the appeal from the judgment, so much of the order of protection as directed that it remain in effect until and including October 15, 2035, is vacated, as a matter of discretion and in the interest of justice, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new determination of the duration of the order of protection; and it is further,

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

As the People correctly concede, the duration of the order of protection issued at the time of sentencing exceeded the maximum time limit set forth in CPL 530.13(4)(A), as it did not take into account the defendant's jail-time credit (see People v. Gooding, 174 A.D.3d 642, 643, 101 N.Y.S.3d 876 ). Accordingly, we vacate so much of the order of protection as directed that it remain in effect until and including October 15, 2035, and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new determination of the duration of the order of protection (see People v. Alston, 188 A.D.3d 1235, 1235, 132 N.Y.S.3d 782 ; People v. Gooding, 174 A.D.3d at 643, 101 N.Y.S.3d 876 ).

IANNACCI, J.P., MILLER, ZAYAS and DOWLING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Palmer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 23, 2022
203 A.D.3d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

People v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Brian PALMER, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 23, 2022

Citations

203 A.D.3d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
203 A.D.3d 1075

Citing Cases

People v. Vanhoven

As the People, in effect, correctly concede, the duration of the order of protection issued at sentencing…