From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Paganini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1990
162 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

June 18, 1990

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.).


Ordered that the judgment as amended is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The defendant claims that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel because of certain inactions on the part of his original attorney. That claim is predicated on matters dehors the record, and is not reviewable on direct appeal (see, People v. Southard, 158 A.D.2d 490; People v. Bux, 144 A.D.2d 683). Moreover, we decline to reduce the defendant's sentence in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Eiber, J.P., Harwood, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Paganini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1990
162 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Paganini

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANTE E. PAGANINI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1990

Citations

162 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

Matter of Paganini v. Harrington

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and…