Opinion
November 19, 1984
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lawrence, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
Witnesses Ramos and Hernandez could not be considered accomplices of the defendant, as a matter of law, whose testimony required corroboration since, at an earlier trial, a trial order of dismissal was issued as to these former codefendants, not only as to a murder charge but also as to all possible lesser included charges (see CPL 60.22, subd 3). Furthermore, defendant's failure to request an accomplice charge or to object to the charge as given is fatal (see, e.g., People v Minarich, 46 N.Y.2d 970). We have considered defendant's other arguments and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J.P., Thompson, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.