From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pagan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 15, 1990
161 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

May 15, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Juanita Bing Newton, J.).


We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or excessive. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction", we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and, "[h]aving received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms." (People v. Felman, 141 A.D.2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 918.)

Concur — Ross, J.P., Milonas, Kassal, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Pagan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 15, 1990
161 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Pagan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD PAGAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 15, 1990

Citations

161 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
555 N.Y.S.2d 347

Citing Cases

Crowe v. Gerling Global Reinsurance Corporation of America

" N.Y. Labor Law § 190(1) (McKinney 1986). Incentive compensation based on factors falling outside the scope…