From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Padilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 2010
76 A.D.3d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 3246.

September 23, 2010.

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), rendered April 17, 2009, resentencing defendant to concurrent terms of 12 years, with five years' postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Joseph M. Nursey of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sheila L. Bautista of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Román, JJ.


The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was not barred by double jeopardy, since defendant was still serving his prison term at that time, and therefore had no reasonable expectation of finality in his illegal sentence ( see People v Murrell, 73 AD3d 598).

We have considered and rejected defendant's due process argument. Defendant's remaining claims are similar to arguments that were rejected in People v Williams ( 14 NY3d 198).


Summaries of

People v. Padilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 2010
76 A.D.3d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Padilla

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAFAEL PADILLA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 23, 2010

Citations

76 A.D.3d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 6693
907 N.Y.S.2d 826

Citing Cases

People v. Guity

The Court agrees with the District Attorney that a resentencing proceeding at this time, imposing a post…