From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Padilla

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Aug 26, 2020
S263375 (Cal. Aug. 26, 2020)

Summary

In Padilla, No. S263375, our Supreme Court granted review on the following question: “When a judgment becomes final, but is later vacated, altered, or amended and a new sentence imposed, is the case no longer final for the purpose of applying an intervening ameliorative change in the law?

Summary of this case from People v. Godinez

Opinion

S263375

08-26-2020

PEOPLE v. PADILLA (MARIO SALVADOR)


B297213 Second Appellate District, Div. 4

Petition for review granted

Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, Kruger, and Groban, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Padilla

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Aug 26, 2020
S263375 (Cal. Aug. 26, 2020)

In Padilla, No. S263375, our Supreme Court granted review on the following question: “When a judgment becomes final, but is later vacated, altered, or amended and a new sentence imposed, is the case no longer final for the purpose of applying an intervening ameliorative change in the law?

Summary of this case from People v. Godinez
Case details for

People v. Padilla

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. PADILLA (MARIO SALVADOR)

Court:California Supreme Court (Minute Order)

Date published: Aug 26, 2020

Citations

S263375 (Cal. Aug. 26, 2020)

Citing Cases

People v. Godinez

Our Supreme Court is presently considering which of these statutory amendments applies to the resentencing of…