From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Padilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 16, 2003
308 A.D.2d 368 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1588

September 16, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J.), rendered October 5, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4½ to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Karen Schlossberg, for respondent.

Paul Liu Pro Se, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Ellerin, J.P., Williams, Lerner, Friedman, Gonzalez, JJ.


The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). Issues of credibility and identification were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations.

Defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim involves factual assertions outside the record that would require a CPL 440.10 motion. To the extent the existing record permits review, it establishes that defendant received meaningful representation (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714) and renders untenable defendant's pro se claim that the decision that he not testify was made without consulting him.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Padilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 16, 2003
308 A.D.2d 368 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Padilla

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWIN PADILLA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 16, 2003

Citations

308 A.D.2d 368 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
764 N.Y.S.2d 354