Opinion
May 13, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dubin, J., Rubin, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
We see no basis, on this record, to substitute our judgment for that of the Judge presiding at the suppression hearing, who credited the testimony of the arresting officer ( see, People v Valo, 92 A.D.2d 1004; People v. Hopkins, 86 A.D.2d 937, 938; People v. Duncan, 75 A.D.2d 823, 824; People v. Wright, 71 A.D.2d 585, 586) and we reject defendant's contention that this testimony "has all appearances of having been patently tailored to nullify constitutional objections" ( People v. Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86, 88; see, People v. Africk, 107 A.D.2d 700; People v Rodriguez, 105 A.D.2d 718). O'Connor, J.P., Weinstein, Brown and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.