From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ott

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Aug 23, 2017
57 N.Y.S.3d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

08-23-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony N. OTT, Defendant–Appellant.


MEMORANDUM:

Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal, specifically, whether the court erred when it failed to comply with CPL 310.30 in its handling of jury notes. Upon our review of the motion papers, we conclude that the issue may have merit. The order of April 29, 2011 is vacated and this Court will consider the appeal de novo (see People v. LeFrois, 151 A.D.2d 1046, 544 N.Y.S.2d 508 ). Defendant is directed to file and serve his records and briefs with this Court on or before December 28, 2017.

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted.

SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, and DeJOSEPH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ott

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Aug 23, 2017
57 N.Y.S.3d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Ott

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony N. OTT…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 23, 2017

Citations

57 N.Y.S.3d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Citing Cases

People v. Ott

Later, we affirmed the resentence ( People v. Ott , 126 A.D.3d 1372, 5 N.Y.S.3d 653 [4th Dept. 2015], lv…

People v. Ott

Memorandum: On a prior appeal, we modified the judgment convicting defendant upon a jury verdict of murder in…