From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Osborne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1987
133 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

October 26, 1987

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant, who has interposed no challenge to his plea of guilty, acknowledged during the plea allocution that no promise was being made concerning sentence and that he understood he could receive a sentence of up to seven years. He therefore cannot be heard to complain that an alleged off-the-record "promise" by the prosecutor of a 2- to 4-year term induced his plea (People v. Selikoff, 35 N.Y.2d 227, cert denied 419 U.S. 1122). The defendant's present claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel is not established by the record and should have been raised by a collateral or postjudgment motion (cf., People v. Brown, 45 N.Y.2d 852). Finally, we do not find that the sentence imposed is harsh or excessive (People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Thompson, J.P., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Osborne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1987
133 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Osborne

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL OSBORNE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 26, 1987

Citations

133 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Vulpis

Finally, the defendant's assertion of a purported off-the-record sentencing promise by another Judge is…

People v. Martin

The plea minutes are devoid of any mention of any final agreement regarding a sentencing recommendation (see,…