From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 2008
49 A.D.3d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2977.

March 4, 2008.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki A. Scherer, J., at motions; Edwin Torres, J., at suppression hearing; Charles H. Solomon, J., at plea and sentence), rendered June 21, 2005, convicting defendant of attempted murder in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 12½ to 25 years, unanimously affirmed.

Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Kerry S. Jamieson of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Eleanor J. Ostrow of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.


The court properly denied defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment, which originally charged second-degree murder, made on the ground of preindictment delay. Defendant has not established any prejudice from the 11-year delay, which was caused by the fact that the police had no witnesses or suspects, and, despite good faith efforts, did not ascertain the identity of the perpetrator until after the advent of new fingerprint comparison technology ( see United States v Lovasco, 431 US 783; People v Singer, 44 NY2d 241, 252-255; People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442). Defendant's arguments to the contrary, including those that improperly cite documents that are not part of the record, are without merit.

Defendant's written and oral waivers, taken together, establish a valid and enforceable waiver of the right to appeal ( see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248). The court expressly informed defendant that as a condition of the plea he was agreeing to waive his right to appeal, and the court separated that right from the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea. This waiver forecloses review of defendant's procedural and substantive claims relating to his suppression motion, and his excessive sentence claim. In any event, we find all of these claims without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 2008
49 A.D.3d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RUBEN ORTIZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 4, 2008

Citations

49 A.D.3d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 1859
854 N.Y.S.2d 2

Citing Cases

People v. Rivera

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.The record demonstrates that the defendant's written and oral waivers…

People v. Ortiz

September 29, 2008. Appeal from the 1st Dept: 49 AD3d 279 (NY). Graffeo,…