From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 21, 2007
41 A.D.3d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 1385.

June 21, 2007.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Lee Price, J.), rendered April 6, 2006, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent felony offender, to a term of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Bruce D. Austern of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (T. Charles Won of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Sullivan, J.P., Nardelli, Williams, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.


The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's mistrial motion based on a portion of the prosecutor's summation. The court prevented any possible prejudice when it sustained defendant's objection and provided suitable curative instructions ( see e.g. People v Singleton, 270 AD2d 190, lv denied 95 NY2d 858).

The court properly exercised its discretion in sentencing defendant as a persistent felony offender. The record establishes sufficient basis for an adjudication based on defendant's criminal history. Furthermore, the medical evidence of record indicates that defendant will still be physically capable of reverting to robbery should a shorter sentence be imposed. The adjudication procedure was constitutional ( see People v Rivera, 5 NY3d 61, cert denied 546 US 984).


Summaries of

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 21, 2007
41 A.D.3d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

People v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SCOTT ORTIZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 21, 2007

Citations

41 A.D.3d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 5416
836 N.Y.S.2d 877

Citing Cases

People v. Watts

ourt "struck an appropriate balance between the probative value of the defendant's prior crimes and the…

People v. Watts

The defendant's contention that his adjudication as a persistent felony offender was unconstitutional…