Opinion
No. 570390/14.
11-15-2017
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose ORTEGA a/k/a Jorge Ortega, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment of conviction (Carol R. Sharpe, J.), rendered February 25, 2014, reversed, on the law, and the accusatory instrument is dismissed.
The misdemeanor complaint and supporting deposition charged criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (see Penal Law § 165.40 ), upon allegations that defendant possessed "in his hand," a certain Hewlett Packard laptop computer and power cord, and that the "lawful custodian" of these two items never gave defendant "permission or authority to possess or exercise control over said property." We agree with defendant that the accusatory instrument is jurisdictionally defective, since it failed to allege facts sufficient to establish essential elements of the offense, namely that the property "was stolen by someone" ( People v. McFarland, 181 A.D.2d 1007 [1992], lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 1051 [1992], quoting People v. Corsetti, 10 A.D.2d 685 [1960] ), and that defendant knew the property was stolen (see Matter of Carlique P., 42 AD3d 367, 369–370 [2007] ).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur.