Opinion
2013-07-17
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Luis NUNEZ, appellant.
Luis Nunez, Napanoch, N.Y., appellant pro se. Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Carrie A. Ciganek of counsel), for respondent.
Luis Nunez, Napanoch, N.Y., appellant pro se. Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Carrie A. Ciganek of counsel), for respondent.
, J.P., DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, THOMAS A. DICKERSON, and JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Apotheker, J.), imposed June 13, 2011, upon his conviction of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, the resentence being a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed on May 11, 2000, upon the conviction of assault in the first degree.
ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the County Court improperly resentenced him after the expiration of the time limit set forth in Correction Law § 601–d(4)(d) is without merit ( see People v. Velez, 19 N.Y.3d 642, 649, 951 N.Y.S.2d 461, 975 N.E.2d 907;People v. McDaniel, 99 A.D.3d 814, 814, 952 N.Y.S.2d 246).
The defendant's contention, in effect, that his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision violated his right to due process also is without merit, since he had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment at the time he was resentenced ( see People v. Lingle, 16 N.Y.3d 621, 630–632, 926 N.Y.S.2d 4, 949 N.E.2d 952;People v. Louis, 90 A.D.3d 1075, 1075, 935 N.Y.S.2d 516).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.