From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nunez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1998
248 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 9, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Koch, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the sentence imposed to an indeterminate term of 4 to 8 years imprisonment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Although the court may enhance a defendant's sentence when he or she breaches a condition of a plea agreement ( see, People v. Figgins, 87 N.Y.2d 840; People v. Avery, 85 N.Y.2d 503, 506-507; People v. Outley, 80 N.Y.2d 702; People v. Davis, 239 A.D.2d 356), the defendant did not breach a condition of the plea agreement ( see, People v. Auslander, 146 A.D.2d 936, 937). The fact that the defendant subsequently moved to vacate his plea by making allegations which were at variance with his plea admissions was not a proper ground under the terms of the plea agreement for enhancing the originally agreed-upon sentence ( cf., People v. Spina, 186 A.D.2d 9, 10; People v. Carr, 135 A.D.2d 722; People v. Brunson, 131 A.D.2d 689, 690).

Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Nunez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1998
248 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Nunez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FELIPE NUNEZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 881

Citing Cases

People v. Parker

We conclude, therefore, that the court improperly enhanced defendants' sentences. We further conclude that…

People v. Hendricks [4th Dept 2000

When defendant failed to appear for sentencing, the court issued a bench warrant and defendant was picked up…