From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Norfort

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 5, 2012
101 A.D.3d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-12-5

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Ronnie NORFORT, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Gregory Musso on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Gregory Musso on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mondo, J.), imposed June 29, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal ( see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145;People v. Holmes, 95 A.D.3d 1236, 943 N.Y.S.2d 906). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

MASTRO, J.P., SKELOS, LEVENTHAL, AUSTIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Norfort

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 5, 2012
101 A.D.3d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Norfort

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Ronnie NORFORT, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 5, 2012

Citations

101 A.D.3d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 8340
954 N.Y.S.2d 499

Citing Cases

People v. Terrell

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed. The defendant's purported waivers of his right to appeal were…

People v. Taylor

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (…