From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nichols

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 19, 2000
276 A.D.2d 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

October 19, 2000.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (McGrath, J.), rendered October 16, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the second degree.

Eugene P. Grimmick, Troy, for appellant.

Kenneth R. Bruno, District Attorney (Bruce E. Knoll of counsel), Troy, for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Pursuant to a plea bargain and in exchange for an agreed-upon sentence of seven years in prison, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of robbery in full satisfaction of a multicount indictment and waived his right to appeal. At the time of sentencing, County Court ordered that defendant make restitution in the amount of $1,221.02 as requested by the People in spite of the fact that such was not included as part of the plea bargain. Defendant now appeals.

Initially, we reject the People's argument that the propriety of the restitution order is not properly before us due to defendant's waiver of appeal. Such waiver clearly was predicated upon the imposition of the agreed-upon sentence and should not be enforced where the sentence imposed is contrary to such agreement (cf.,People v. Fabian, 240 A.D.2d 591, 592, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 904). Turning to the merits, inasmuch as restitution was not included in the plea bargain, County Court had an obligation to offer defendant the opportunity to either "withdraw his plea or to accept the greater sentence of restitution in addition to a prison sentence" (People v. Cowan, 168 A.D.2d 509, 509). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to County Court for that purpose (see, id.; see also, People v. Cisco, 208 A.D.2d 643).

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; matter remitted to the County Court of Rensselaer County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision; and, as so modified, affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Nichols

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 19, 2000
276 A.D.2d 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Nichols

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANDREW J. NICHOLS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 19, 2000

Citations

276 A.D.2d 832 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
714 N.Y.S.2d 553

Citing Cases

People v. Watson

We affirm. While it is true, as defendant contends, that the payment of restitution was not mentioned during…

People v. Toms

At the time of sentencing, County Court also ordered defendant to pay restitution in the amount of $3,296.…