Opinion
November 13, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court (Ledina, J.).
Petitioner is a prison inmate, serving a sentence of 25 years to life following his 1973 conviction of the crime of murder in the first degree. Petitioner sought a writ of habeas corpus after he was denied release on parole. Our review of the record herein discloses no abuse of discretion in respondent State Board of Parole's denial of petitioner's request for parole release. Among the factors considered by the Board were the heinous nature of the crime of which petitioner was convicted (his victim was beaten and stabbed to death), the fact that this crime was committed while petitioner was under parole supervision and his criminal history of assault and robbery. The Board also took note of petitioner's exemplary record of achievement during incarceration. As the Board considered the relevant statutory and regulatory factors, its determination will not be disturbed ( see, People ex rel. Frazier v. Demsky, 238 A.D.2d 641). Petitioner's contention that the Board erred in applying the standards set forth in Executive Law § 259-i (L 1977, ch 904) to his case is unpersuasive ( see, People ex rel. Gilmore v New York State Parole Bd., 241 A.D.2d 793; Matter of Rentz v Herbert, 206 A.D.2d 944, 945, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 810). The remaining contentions raised by petitioner have been considered and found to be without merit.
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.