From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Neubauer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 2002
296 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2000-00039

Argued June 13, 2002.

July 22, 2002.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered December 16, 1999, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

David Goodman, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (David Steinberg of counsel; Adam M. Bialek on the brief), for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Jessica Z. Segal of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, there was a reasonable basis articulated in the record to justify the County Court's determination to have him handcuffed when he testified before the Grand Jury (see People v. Rouse, 79 N.Y.2d 934, 935; People v. Tucker, 261 A.D.2d 877, 878; People v. Grant, 234 A.D.2d 562). In any event, reversal is not required since the prosecutor's cautionary instructions to the Grand Jury dispelled any possible prejudice to the defendant (see People v. Felder, 201 A.D.2d 884, 885; People v. McEachin, 166 A.D.2d 814, 815; People v. Gallan, 78 A.D.2d 904).

O'BRIEN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, McGINITY and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Neubauer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 2002
296 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Neubauer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. PATRICK P. NEUBAUER, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 22, 2002

Citations

296 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
745 N.Y.S.2d 699

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Reversal of the defendant's conviction is not warranted on the ground…

People v. Pennick

We conclude, however, that the integrity of the grand jury proceeding was not impaired. In seeking dismissal…