From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 18, 1995
222 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 18, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Quinones, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record indicates that the police conduct in this case was justified at its inception and reasonably limited in scope at each step in response to the circumstances presented ( People v Bianchi, 208 A.D.2d 551, affd 85 N.Y.2d 1022; People v Landy, 59 N.Y.2d 369; People v Mills, 198 A.D.2d 236; People v Adams, 123 A.D.2d 769). Consequently, the Supreme Court properly denied suppression of physical evidence and a statement made by the defendant to law enforcement officials. Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Sullivan and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 18, 1995
222 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY NELSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 18, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 637

Citing Cases

People v. Moyaho

Moreover, as handguns are often carried in the waistband ( see People v. Benjamin, 51 NY2d 267, 271), when…

People v. McKnight

Since the defendant was never informed at the plea allocution that the plea was conditioned upon his waiver…