From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 11, 1996
225 A.D.2d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 11, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Braun, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, the branch of the defendant's omnibus motion, pursuant to CPL 210.20 (1) (c) and 210.35 (5), which was to dismiss the first count of Indictment No. 3162/93, charging him with criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, is denied, that count of the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

Contrary to the Supreme Court's determination, the evidence adduced at the Grand Jury, which consisted solely of the testimony of the undercover officer, "did not so clearly support the [agency] defense as to require its submission" to the Grand Jury (People v Valles, 62 N.Y.2d 36, 41; see also, People v Thompson, 174 A.D.2d 1007; People v Beverly, 148 A.D.2d 922; cf., People v Jenkins, 157 A.D.2d 854). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in dismissing the first count of the indictment based on the People's failure to charge the agency defense, and that count of the indictment must be reinstated. Bracken, J.P., O'Brien, Sullivan and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 11, 1996
225 A.D.2d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. CLIVE NELSON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 739

Citing Cases

People v. Burden

We disagree. The evidence before the Grand Jury, which consisted of the testimony of undercover police…