From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PEOPLE v. NEFF

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1985
110 A.D.2d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Summary

In Neff, defendant was sentenced to the maximum period of incarceration for his crime, ordered to make restitution and was assessed a $40 surcharge or, in the alternative, to paying the surcharge, was to serve an additional three-day jail sentence.

Summary of this case from People v. Berry

Opinion

April 8, 1985

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.).


Sentence modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof imposing a surcharge of $40 or, in the alternative, a three-day term of imprisonment. As so modified, sentence affirmed. Defendant may make an application to the County Court, Nassau County, for a refund of the $40, and upon proof that payment has been made, his application shall be granted.

Although the defendant has apparently satisfied that portion of the subject judgment as imposed a mandatory surcharge of $40 or, in the alternative, an additional sentence of three days' imprisonment, by rendering full payment of the $40 surcharge, we do not choose to dismiss the issue of the propriety of the alternative three-day term of imprisonment as academic in view of the possibility of its recurrence.

As the People concede, in the event that defendant failed to pay the $40 surcharge, he could not be required to serve an additional term of three days' imprisonment inasmuch as he was sentenced, upon his plea of guilty to petit larceny, to the maximum term of incarceration which could be imposed for a class A misdemeanor (CPL 420.10 [d]). Consequently, the imposition of a three-day jail sentence as an alternative to the $40 surcharge was improper.

Further, where a defendant has made restitution or reparations, he shall not be required to pay a mandatory surcharge (Penal Law § 60.35). Therefore, the imposition of a $40 surcharge was inconsistent with the requirement that defendant make restitution.

Accordingly, we modify the sentence by deleting the provision thereof which imposed a surcharge of $40, or, in the alternative, a three-day term of imprisonment. Defendant may make an application in the County Court, Nassau County, for a refund of the $40. Mollen, P.J., Titone, Thompson and Weinstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

PEOPLE v. NEFF

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1985
110 A.D.2d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

In Neff, defendant was sentenced to the maximum period of incarceration for his crime, ordered to make restitution and was assessed a $40 surcharge or, in the alternative, to paying the surcharge, was to serve an additional three-day jail sentence.

Summary of this case from People v. Berry
Case details for

PEOPLE v. NEFF

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL NEFF, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 8, 1985

Citations

110 A.D.2d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Willis

Accordingly, the matter is remitted for a hearing concerning the amount of restitution and the manner of…

People v. Turco

Further, it was permissible to make a portion of the restitution payable to the insurance company (People v.…