From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Neer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 10, 2004
8 A.D.3d 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

13986.

Decided and Entered: June 10, 2004.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered April 29, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the third degree.

Jay L. Wilber, Public Defender, Binghamton (William L. Brown of counsel), for appellant.

Gerald F. Mollen, District Attorney, Binghamton (Robin S. Engler of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to rape in the third degree as charged in a superior court information. At the time that defendant entered the plea, County Court indicated that it would sentence defendant to six months in jail, to be followed by 10 years' probation. After receipt of the presentence investigation report, however, County Court informed the parties that it could not adhere to the original sentence and intended to sentence defendant to 1 to 4 years in prison. Because of this change, the court afforded defendant the opportunity to withdraw his plea, which defendant declined.

Subsequently, the court sentenced defendant to 1 to 4 years in prison, and defendant now appeals.

We reject defendant's claim that the sentence is harsh and excessive. Defendant admitted to having sexual intercourse with his 16-year-old stepdaughter. According to the presentence investigation report, the victim reported that she had been sexually abused by defendant since the age of seven. She related that she remained silent for many years because defendant had threatened her with physical harm. Defendant was convicted in 1996 of sexual abuse in the third degree and endangering the welfare of a child as the result of molesting the victim's sister. In view of the nature of the crime and defendant's continued victimization of young girls, we find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v. Shute, 243 A.D.2d 794, 795; People v. Lilley, 238 A.D.2d 755, 756, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 860; People v. Blair, 228 A.D.2d 720).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Neer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 10, 2004
8 A.D.3d 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Neer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PATRICK W. NEER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 10, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 220

Citing Cases

People v. Ali-Rachedi

Defendant was afforded the opportunity at sentencing to challenge the content of the report and, while County…