From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Neeley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1957
4 A.D.2d 1019 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Opinion

December 10, 1957


Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. The alleged defects in the proceedings before the Magistrate do not affect the validity of the indictment not otherwise challenged. ( People ex rel. Hirschberg v. Close, 1 N.Y.2d 258.) The allegations of incompetence of defendant's counsel and the claim of fraud in respect of counsel and the District Attorney are conclusory and devoid of factual support and hence cannot justify relief by writ of error coram nobis ( People v. Fanning, 300 N.Y. 593; People v. Oddo, 300 N.Y. 649; People v. Moore, 284 App. Div. 925) and, further, the claims alleged are patently incredible.

Concur — Botein, J.P., Rabin, Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Neeley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1957
4 A.D.2d 1019 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)
Case details for

People v. Neeley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD NEELEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1957

Citations

4 A.D.2d 1019 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

From the record itself it does not appear that a hearing must be granted on the defendant's allegations. (See…

People v. Mysholowsky

Order affirmed. The allegation of conspiracy between the District Attorney and the police officers to give…