From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Navarro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1998
251 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 1, 1998

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Vaughn, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The limited extent to which the confidential "informant was allowed to invoke the privilege against self-incrimination herein did not unfairly undermine the defendant's right to confrontation ( see, People v. Chin, 67 N.Y.2d 22; People v. Brock, 238 A.D.2d 347). The court therefore properly declined to strike the testimony of this witness.

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Navarro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1998
251 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Navarro

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALEXANDER NAVARRO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 1015

Citing Cases

People v. Willis

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the limited extent to which a…