From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nathan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1985
110 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

April 22, 1985

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Stolarik, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Defendant is not entitled to a mistrial predicated upon his own contumacious behavior ( see, Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501, 505, n 2; Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337; United States v Bentvena, 319 F.2d 916, cert denied sub nom. Ormento v. United States, 375 U.S. 940; People v. Epps, 37 N.Y.2d 343, cert denied 423 U.S. 999; People v. Palermo, 32 N.Y.2d 222).

Defendant's contention that the court should have dismissed counts five, nine and eleven of the indictment because they were lesser included offenses of count one does not have any merit (CPL 1.20; see, People v. Glover, 57 N.Y.2d 61; People v Perez, 45 N.Y.2d 204; People v. Acevedo, 40 N.Y.2d 701). Lazer, J.P., O'Connor, Weinstein and Brown, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Nathan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1985
110 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Nathan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JONATHAN NATHAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1985

Citations

110 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Young

The Trial Justice in the case at bar interviewed each juror individually in the presence of counsel, and gave…

People v. White

We find no merit to the defendant's contention that the trial court improvidently exercised its discretion in…